OS X vs Vista
What is the meaning of life? Is there a God? Why is belly button fluff always blue? These questions have led to wars, famine and sleepless nights for millennia, but there's one with even greater importance--which is better, Mac OS X or Windows Vista? It's the question that won't go away, and no matter how many times the arguments are rehearsed, there never seems to be a proper resolution. The rows recently stepped up a gear with Apple adding fuel to the argument with its new advertising campaign, while Microsoft has applied liberal amounts of "Wow" to its new Vista OS. The debate needs to end. It's time for a definitive answer. We've decided to settle the question once and for all in the fairest way possible--with an Elizabethan-style duel. Our "actors" have assumed the roles of each operating system. Baron Vista is played by the big, brash fellow in the orange garb and Count OS X by the well moisturized man in black. Their task is to win the hand of the fair Maiden Mainstream, played as in olden times by the hairy bloke in the dress. They'll be trying to woo her by completing a series of old-world challenges. The outcomes are determined by how good each OS' security, performance and usability aspects are. Is OS X trendier, easier and safer than the competition? Or is Vista the new king of the hill? Which one gets the chick? The battle lines have been drawn, gloves have been slapped across faces--it's time for a smackdown, Shakespeare style. | |||||
- Talkback
-
dstoti says...
I am a comfortable user of both platforms, having been entirely "Mac" or entirely "windows" at various times of my life. But, I must say, I can't entirely agree with this, humorous, albeit misdirected scenario. Misdirected you say? Yes, while one can't ignore the impact of the "market share" that Windows has, saying that it wins largely because there are more copies of it out there and therefore more software available is an artifact of a (possibly) bad decision made by Apple more than a decade ago. My controlling the makers of their hardware, the hardware was much better than the majority of boxes that people used to load Windows on, but they lost the market share war. Would you say that a Honda Accord is a better car than a BMW 750, because there are more of them on the road? I dare say that if the die had not been cast in the mid-nineties, and people were able to have equal access to software between the 2 systems, Mac would rule the roost, because all other things being equal, it is a better machine.
Feb 12, 2008 03:48
I am a comfortable user of both platforms, having been entirely "Mac" or entirely "windows" at various times of my life. But, I must say, I can't entirely agree with this, humorous, albeit misdirected scenario. Misdirected you say? Yes, while one can't ignore the impact of the "market share" that Windows has, saying that it wins largely because there are more copies of it out there and therefore more software available is an artifact of a (possibly) bad decision made by Apple more than a decade ago. My controlling the makers of their hardware, the hardware was much better than the majority of boxes that people used to load Windows on, but they lost the market share war. Would you say that a Honda Accord is a better car than a BMW 750, because there are more of them on the road? I dare say that if the die had not been cast in the mid-nineties, and people were able to have equal access to software between the 2 systems, Mac would rule the roost, because all other things being equal, it is a better machine.
Feb 12, 2008 03:48
techdrive says...
There isn’t a single operating system on this planet that can surpass Vista when it comes to the number of tech buffs who antagonized it. There's a reason for that. After seeing Vista for the first time last year (launched in the Philippines sometime in January 2007), I was somewhat disappointed to see that it didn’t look so impressive after aeons of extensive development. But I thought it was quite cool and striking with an improved interface and definitely clear fun to play around with as compared to XP.
Vista is fun but it’s not perfect. I think its a copycat preposterous version of Mac OS X. It has actually done away with the cartoon-like look of the XP family and replaces it with an graphically intensive interface that does like a Mac. For the gazillions who are not really familiar with Mac graphical display formats, Vista’s eye-catching spectacle is a clear winner.
But for the Mac user’s point of view, the similarities are quite striking notably the translucent windows. Compare Mac’s Spotlight and Vista’s Browser, Mac’s Dashboard with Widgets and Vista’s Sidebar with Gadgets, and Mac’s iCal with Vista’s Calendar. The cool 3D flipping swooshing effect of Vista's Aero with thumbnail display, the new incarnation of the Alt-Tab command when you switch from one window to another lets you stack and flip windows like deck cards. I think its Vista's version of the OS X's Cover Flow.
Although I prefer using the Leopard, I'm using Windows just because I'm forced to use it. I really can't live without Vista or XP with a vast number of devices, apps and Web sites clutched to my job that can only run on Windows.
WIndows Vista is good...But I can say with dstoti, the "better machine" Mac runs the OS X.
Sep 21, 2008 05:36
There isn’t a single operating system on this planet that can surpass Vista when it comes to the number of tech buffs who antagonized it. There's a reason for that. After seeing Vista for the first time last year (launched in the Philippines sometime in January 2007), I was somewhat disappointed to see that it didn’t look so impressive after aeons of extensive development. But I thought it was quite cool and striking with an improved interface and definitely clear fun to play around with as compared to XP.
Vista is fun but it’s not perfect. I think its a copycat preposterous version of Mac OS X. It has actually done away with the cartoon-like look of the XP family and replaces it with an graphically intensive interface that does like a Mac. For the gazillions who are not really familiar with Mac graphical display formats, Vista’s eye-catching spectacle is a clear winner.
But for the Mac user’s point of view, the similarities are quite striking notably the translucent windows. Compare Mac’s Spotlight and Vista’s Browser, Mac’s Dashboard with Widgets and Vista’s Sidebar with Gadgets, and Mac’s iCal with Vista’s Calendar. The cool 3D flipping swooshing effect of Vista's Aero with thumbnail display, the new incarnation of the Alt-Tab command when you switch from one window to another lets you stack and flip windows like deck cards. I think its Vista's version of the OS X's Cover Flow.
Although I prefer using the Leopard, I'm using Windows just because I'm forced to use it. I really can't live without Vista or XP with a vast number of devices, apps and Web sites clutched to my job that can only run on Windows.
WIndows Vista is good...But I can say with dstoti, the "better machine" Mac runs the OS X.
Sep 21, 2008 05:36
overdose says...
To the author of this article.....you're seriously (and probably rooted) in geekland....This article is somewhat a pathetic attempt to sound interesting...
The adage stands, I'm afraid... "Once you go Mac....you never go Mac". Please try to sound more interesting in your future articles....
Feb 01, 2009 03:17
To the author of this article.....you're seriously (and probably rooted) in geekland....This article is somewhat a pathetic attempt to sound interesting...
The adage stands, I'm afraid... "Once you go Mac....you never go Mac". Please try to sound more interesting in your future articles....
Feb 01, 2009 03:17
vpsarvvinodhan says...
I have used both Vista and OS X for the past few years.
Vista ---> You get tonnes of softwares and easily runs games of any genre. And, i still use it for one reason -> being, all the other people in my Business use this. If i have to send a word doc, i cant send it using iwork's Pages 09. VISTA doesnt read it. Agree that there are few paid apps to convert, yet how many are willing to do that in INDIA...???
And, Vista is HACKER's Fav. So you get tonnes of Virus. A Big Blow..! !
OS X ---> Just upgraded to Snow Loepard. Tell you what.. I cant get my hand out of this OS X. My, MBP is just HOT as an actress. Sexyy.. Wanna get a costly Date??? Buy Macs.
Agree that it takes time to shift from Vista to Os X and understand. But once you are used to it Vista is out of your mind.
Now, i browse hell Lot on net. So, on MBP i dont even have an Anti-Virus but all fire Walls blocked. Trust me Since i got my MacBook Pro i never restarted it because of an issues ( Which is a daily procedure on Vista )
STABILITY- Wow.. You never get better stability.
My Word is both are very Good. Yet, OS X has the edge.
Sep 26, 2009 14:29
I have used both Vista and OS X for the past few years.
Vista ---> You get tonnes of softwares and easily runs games of any genre. And, i still use it for one reason -> being, all the other people in my Business use this. If i have to send a word doc, i cant send it using iwork's Pages 09. VISTA doesnt read it. Agree that there are few paid apps to convert, yet how many are willing to do that in INDIA...???
And, Vista is HACKER's Fav. So you get tonnes of Virus. A Big Blow..! !
OS X ---> Just upgraded to Snow Loepard. Tell you what.. I cant get my hand out of this OS X. My, MBP is just HOT as an actress. Sexyy.. Wanna get a costly Date??? Buy Macs.
Agree that it takes time to shift from Vista to Os X and understand. But once you are used to it Vista is out of your mind.
Now, i browse hell Lot on net. So, on MBP i dont even have an Anti-Virus but all fire Walls blocked. Trust me Since i got my MacBook Pro i never restarted it because of an issues ( Which is a daily procedure on Vista )
STABILITY- Wow.. You never get better stability.
My Word is both are very Good. Yet, OS X has the edge.
Sep 26, 2009 14:29
To post comments, you need to become a member. It's FREE.
