advertisement
 
 Print    Email     Bookmark     Share

Apple Newton vs Samsung Q1 UMPC



Round 4: Usability




Mac fanboys will tell you that Apple computers are famed for their ease of use, but the Q1 lays the smackdown on the Newton in this category, too. The Q1 features excellent handwriting recognition that quickly and accurately turns movements from your stylus (cleverly hidden away in the top right side of the unit) into proper text.

It's not just guesswork, either--the Q1 uses a neural net, which means it uses several information sources to determine what you want to write, rather than trying to translate ink strokes into letters and words. For example, when you write "ing" on the screen, the system looks at its dictionary, how you wrote the word, rules of grammar and more. If the "ing" was written with the cursor immediately after "walk", then you probably meant to add the "ing" to create "walking". If the cursor was immediately after "giraffe", it would make a different decision because "giraffeing" is not a word. Best of all, you don't have to train it to understand your writing.

It's not all about handwriting recognition though--you can tap away at a virtual onscreen keyboard using the stylus, or just talk to it and have it translate your words into onscreen text via the twin array microphones. Still not happy? Then how about the ability to bring up yet another onscreen virtual keyboard and tap the screen with your thumbs? If you're a control freak, the Q1 is your baby.



Samsung appears to have been afraid to commit to a purely pen-based control method, while on the Newton it's the sole input. You can sense Samsung's tentative approach to the stylus throughout the Q1 user experience. There are several escape routes from using the stylus on the Q1, including the touch screen input and direction pad controls.

The reason for Samsung's reticence lies in the vastly different origins of the two operating systems. The Samsung uses Windows, an operating system originally designed from the ground up to be controlled with a mouse and keyboard. The Newton, on the other hand, uses an operating system that was specifically programmed for pen-based input.

Handwriting recognition on the Newton MessagePad 2000 is surprisingly accurate even by today's standards. Wikipedia notes that "many users consider the Newton 2.1 handwriting recognition software better than any of the alternatives since". Indeed, a key part of the success of the Newton's handwriting recognition software is its "modeless error correction". If a word is incorrectly recognized, you double-tap the word and a list of alternatives appears in a contextual menu. You can write in a printed, cursive or mixed style and this is matched against a 93,000-word, customizable dictionary.

Introduction: Let the battle begin
Round 1: Design
Round 2: Screen
Round 3: Applications
Round 4: Usability
Round 5: I/O and synchronization
Round 6: Reliability
Round 7: Networking capabilities
Round 8: Special powers
Conslusion: And the winner is...

 

 

    Talkback
There are currently no comments for this story.
To post comments, you need to become a member. It's FREE.
advertisement