In-ear headphones for less than S$100
By Kelvin Low, CNET Asia
12/06/2009
URL: http://asia.cnet.com/reviews/musicplay/0,39050461,62054987,00.htm
OK, so maybe S$100 isn't cheap in the current climate, but high end, excellent-sounding in-ear headphones can cost a bomb, a cheap pair doesn't seem so expensive. Chances are, these in-ear headphones will sound much better than the stock earbuds that most manufacturers bundle with their media players.
|
|
 |
1. |
Creative Zen Aurvana
CNET Asia rating: 7.5 out of 10
The good: Lightweight, durable, and low profile; comfortable fit; good noise-blocking capability and balanced clean sound.
The bad: Should come with foam earbud option and 1/4\" adapter jack
The bottom line: If you need lightweight and quality in-ear earphones for under S$250, check out the Creative Aurvanas, which match up quite well against the Shure E2cs.
Review | See full specs | Rate this |
|
|
 |
2. |
Beyerdynamic DTX-50
This set has a very strong bass response and thus is recommended if you like to listen to the electronica genre. The downside is that it does not handle higher notes well, and there's a lack of clarity for melodies and vocals.
|
|
|
 |
3. |
Sennheiser CX300
This offers a balanced bass response. It does not have a very deep bass response, but it's tighter and sounds tauter. Reproduction of musical details and midranges is also good, although you may not like the unnaturally wide sound stage.
|
|
|
 |
4. |
AKG K 321
Coming across as having a clear midrange response, this pair is more suited for those who like more vocal and instrumental tracks. Bass is not exactly lacking, but it has a punchy feel to it. The overly bright high end may sound harsh to some.
|
|
|
 |
5. |
Denon C351
Sounding sharp at the high frequencies, this in-ear headphone unfortunately has an average midrange. Bass comes across as a little excessive. However, due to its rather open port design, this in-ear headphone does let in more noise than expected.
|
|