advertisement

Ask CNET Asia

Find Products

  • Brand
  • Price
  • Operating system
  • Phone type
  • Connectivity options
  • Touchscreen
  • Built-in digital camera?
  • Filter »

Buying Advice

Editors' Top 5s

CNET Features

 

LG Prada II

 Email     Bookmark     Share

Average User Rating

from 2 users


Excellent

8

out of 10
 

How would you rate this product?

 

Sort by: Rating |  Date | 

 

2 user reviews

Jump to page: [1] 

Due 2 it's steep price-tag,its nt worth it,otherwise,its quite a nice smartfone 2 own!!

Feb 12, 2009

Rating: 7 out of 10 (Very good)
Pros: Q-werty Keyboard/Large Screen/Wi-Fi/HSDPA/Touchscreen/Slim
Cons: Price/Functions A Little Lag/Camera Pic Is Average/Key-Pads/Camera Flash
Opinion:
Design wise+Q-werty Key pads+Wi-Fi Connection+Large Screen, i'll dfntly giv a thumbs up!Bt dere's stil rm 4 improvement for tis cellfone.Though each of e keys r big enuf n well-spaced,bt its quite difficult 2 press it smtms.If e keys r as easy 2 press juz lyk e Sony Ericsson's Experia X1 type of keypads,it wld b alot betta.E other thin is abt e camera
.Though its a 5mp,bt e pics shown after testin its camera is nt as clear n sharp as i tot it was,e fortunate thin is,overall,e camera is stil ok 2 use bt no flash.Function-wise can stil b improved too.It's a little slow n lag if compared ta e Nokia E71 Smartfone,as e E71's runs n loads super fast when surfin net via wi-fi & totali doesn't lag at all.So if e loadin speed 4 tis LG fone can b faster,its alot betta.Bt of course,even if e runnin & loadin speed improved,bt LG muz mk sure dt it ... Read more

 

WHY NO REVIEWS YET?

Feb 11, 2009

Rating: 9 out of 10 (Spectacular)
Pros: Prada...black
Cons: Price
Opinion:
*I am rating this phone because I have to- based on paper analsyis.

Why are there no reviews of this fashion phone? Are those who own it not able to offer reviews or are they just too busy (even during this economic downtrun) with a social life to find time to share? Or is it because no one is buying this phone because it is too expensive?

 

Jump to page: [1]