Average User Rating
from 22 users
7
out of 10Sort by:
Rating |
Date
|
excellent
Oct 1, 2006Rating: 10 out of 10 (Perfect)
Pros: great screen resolution, unique design, carlzeissoptics, clamshell
Cons: battery,no vibration,no radio
Opinion:
i luv the design "hi-tech", great picture resolution, great video too!!!
TANK-AT-WAR!
Aug 16, 2006Rating: 6 out of 10 (Good)
Pros: 352 x 416 display, luxious lens, 30MB internal, 3G, BL-5B battery
Cons: Totaly over-priced, useless CarlZeiss, bulcky-punky design, bad performance
Opinion:
Now there are about a year and half for this TANK, and what? still as costy as a RollRoyce-in da battle! I wonder why all this high resolution for the screen as it's just 2.1" ?! But really such a combination of the S60 9.1-352*416 interface and the old 6630 processor is badly weird. Whatever this device owners will be satisfied with the BL-5B battery at least.
I was tempted to rate it spectacular!
May 26, 2006Rating: 8 out of 10 (Excellent)
Pros: Screen, Camera (Lens)
Cons: No vibration mode, No Radio, Size, Weight
Opinion:
My previous phones have been Nokia 6600, Nokia 7710, Nokia 8810, SE K750i, SE W800i, SE W550i, imate Jam, O2 XDA II. In short, I have never owned a phone having this crisp a screen and this sharp a camera. Believe me, I have at length compared it n 80 as well. The screen and the camera is better in n 90. The software is better than the usual slow nokia software, however nokia should do better in this arena. Although I have listed 4 cons but the pros out weigh them by huge margin. The phone gets connected to PC with ease (via cable and blue tooth). There are good smart phone features as well. All in all it is a very good buy if you can bear the size and weight.
Tried it before
Jan 15, 2006Rating: 8 out of 10 (Excellent)
Pros: Applications are fast, fantastic user interface and good camara, speaker. The video quality
Cons: size
Opinion:
I've exchanged my phone for his n90. Before started using i actually had some bad impression about it. It proved me wrong however. Applications are fast, fantastic user interface and good camara, speaker. The video quality, as i tried it myself, is truly better than my k750i, though i cannot really spot the difference between the quality of pics of the two phones. one of the better 3g phones on the market i guess.
Video shooting using this phone is good
Nov 19, 2005Rating: 8 out of 10 (Excellent)
Pros:
Cons:
Opinion:
Although the picture quality isn't as good as SE K750i, video is way much better than k750. This is because this phone and maybe the rest of the N-series phones shoots video into MPEG-4 (.mp4) format, but there's an option to shoot using 3gp format also. That's why the video quality is better. As for photos, u can't compare it to SE k750 because the k750 doesn't have 20x digital zoom, the k750 xhas Check out our picks of quality basic phones4x digital zoom.
Sponsored links
Olympus PEN, EP-1 & EP-2
Not a Compact. Not an SLR... It's a PEN!
The new Citi DIVIDEND World MasterCard
Get up to 5% cash back for every dollar charged to your card.
Win an ASUS UL Series Notebook!
Answer 3 simple questions and stand a chance to win an ASUS UL80Vt notebook worth over $1500!
Crack the code
Crack the code with Western Digital and stand to win the new PS3 (slim gaming console).
Just right. Nothing more.
The VAIO X Series. It’s everything you desire and nothing you don’t.
CNET Asia is now on Facebook!
Be part of the most happening tech community in Asia on Facebook
CNET Asia TV
Watch gadget reviews, quick tips, movie trailers and more for FREE.


