S$688
for a 2-year price plan
CNET Asia Review
View score
The bad: Network support for EDGE and presence may be lacking; low photo resolution; display depth can be improved.
The bottom line: The 6220 may offer EDGE and presence but it takes more than Nokia for these two features to work. If you're unwilling to wait for network and handset compatibility, you'll find the 6220 an otherwise unspectacular handset.
Read full review of the Nokia 6220 »
Average User Rating
from 1 users
7
out of 10User Reviews
Nice phone but less features
Aug 6, 2005Rating: 7 out of 10 (Very good)
Pros:
Cons:
Opinion:
I am using Nokia 6225 (USA), which is similar to 6220. The battery sucks. It has low talktime than mentioned. Less than 1.30 hrs. Features are not interesting. I feel Nokia 3410 has better functionality than 6225. 6225 lacks repeat alarm, ringtone composer, and good screensavers. Pros: Good-looking, sleek, radio, good camera. Ease in navigation, good new games. Cons: Low battery talktime, lacks interesting features compared to old models.
Rate It Now
Sponsored links
Olympus PEN, EP-1 & EP-2
Not a Compact. Not an SLR... It's a PEN!
The new Citi DIVIDEND World MasterCard
Get up to 5% cash back for every dollar charged to your card.
Win an ASUS UL Series Notebook!
Answer 3 simple questions and stand a chance to win an ASUS UL80Vt notebook worth over $1500!
Crack the code
Crack the code with Western Digital and stand to win the new PS3 (slim gaming console).
Just right. Nothing more.
The VAIO X Series. It’s everything you desire and nothing you don’t.
Samsung Camera, Two LCDs.
Twice the fun of any camera. Dual LCD makes it easy.
CNET Asia is now on Facebook!
Be part of the most happening tech community in Asia on Facebook
CNET Asia TV
Watch gadget reviews, quick tips, movie trailers and more for FREE.


