advertisement
 
 Print    Email     Bookmark     Share

Motorola's stock plummets on bad news

Once the second-largest handset maker in the world, Motorola has fallen from grace in what is looking more and more like a death spiral.

On Wednesday, the company's stock dropped more than 22 percent, to US$9.55, in midday trading, after the company reported an 84 percent decline in fourth-quarter profit, due mostly to sharp declines in its handset business. The company's newly appointed CEO, Greg Brown, further spooked investors by saying during the conference call with analysts and investors that a turnaround of the handset division "will take longer than expected." Motorola had been counting on reviving its handset business in 2008.

Motorola's stock hasn't traded below US$10 a share since August of 2003.

Motorola has been struggling for several quarters, as its market share has rapidly declined. It now is in third place, in terms of handset shipments, behind market leaders Nokia and Samsung Electronics, respectively.

Motorola's disappointing performance over the past several quarters prompted the ouster of its CEO, Ed Zander, in November. Brown, who had been Motorola's chief operating officer, took over as CEO on January 1.

The biggest problem Motorola has been facing is a lack of compelling and popular handsets, especially in Europe. The company hasn't had a hit phone since the Razr.

Motorola is also suffering from a change in strategy. Instead of chasing after market share at whatever cost and selling phones for little profit, the company has changed course in an attempt to sell more expensive phones for more profit. In the fourth quarter, Motorola shipped 40.9 million handsets, compared a record 65.7 million handsets shipped just a year ago. Of course, many of last year's handsets didn't generate much profit.

But now, without hit phones to drive sales, Motorola is facing a crisis in which it's losing market share amid sinking profits. The company reported that in the fourth quarter, sales of handsets fell 38 percent to US$4.8 billion. The division posted an operating loss of US$1.2 billion in the fourth quarter, compared with an operating profit of US$2.7 billion a year ago.

Meanwhile, Motorola's competitors, particularly Nokia and Samsung, are marching forward with new and compelling handsets. And even though Motorola has said it is kick-starting development on new handsets, it can take at least 18 months for new designs to hit the market. Some analysts believe that it will take most of 2008 for the company to see any recovery in its handset division, which ultimately spells trouble for the company.

"The longer it takes, the harder it will get for Motorola, as the company improves its product portfolio, fends of competitors, while it simultaneously strives to right-size the business," Mark Sue, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, said in a research note.

This story was originally published on CNET News.com.

 

 

    Talkback
sylclh says...
during the 90's..the only handphone brand that i carry was MOTOROLA...ETACS, AMPS sets like Elite,tac ii..rule the podium with an iron fists...than came the gsm 8700 (long battery standby)..back then it was roses for Motorola...with its unique flip-base answer mode n its red n green led lights disco..ing around...

NOw...just dun know why..MOTOROLa sets just aren't appealing any more apart from the temprorily reign of V3....

so i think Moto should roll up your sleeves and start to hire some serious designers and put back that old charm of yours....

 
 
jayce@mtq.com.sg says...
I was a very happy user of Motorole V3 once and startac at the beginning of the mobilephone supremacy.

Have since switch to samsung but deep down, i am still very tempted to use V3 again.

Problem is the new products just cant keep up with its grandfather. Either some feature is missing or the form factor is not as slick as before.

V3i and V3xx almost made the hit but again technology is missing somewhere e.g. wifi, radio, etc...

I think motorola needs to understand although their product is practically featured, consumers are drawn by the value vs features written on that piece of paper and reviews on the net.

Honestly V3i or even a V3 is all i need in a phone. To make and answer calls/sms. But its a green eye when i see samsung having the same slim factor while having radio, flash camera, etc... now even with hsdpa.

 
 
chriskang says...
Personally, i think the Motorola RAZA phones does create an impression with their unique designs but there should be a limit to how long they stay with this. It's good time to move out of the RAZA theme and start another wave of innovative product range.

In terms of technology, they are not really up-to-date with the rest of the mobile phone companies. Areas such as connectivity options and mega pixel of their phone cameras are "weaker" than what the rest of the market are offering.

 
 
gabrielqchan says...
I have always been a Motorola fan, since my first Motorola in 2000, and I am now on my 7th Motorola, the Moto Q9, and I still keep my V60i, V600, V3 Black, Z3, and recently sold my V3 Red. I find Moto phones to have a very high quality, classy feel to it, perhaps of the built quality, unlike Nokia and the Koreans, are very flimpsy. But I do agree that Motorola mobile handsets are not as advanced in terms of features vs Nokia and Samsung. I think the product development team needs to put more thoughts into meeting the market's wants, and keep up with the competition. Other than cutting-edge design, the features are not that great, but I do love my Q9, it is absolutely fantabulous!

 
 
Pointdexler says...
Good point here, the problem with Motorola is they are putting thoughts into what the US market wants, not the Global markets... they still thinks that the whole world revolve round them (US). I agreed Moto Q9 is a good phone but why didn't they include chinese support into Q9 and open up this phone to the chinese market? There are 12 millions chinese in SEA and 1.3 Billion in China. Another point is their marketing strategy need to change. Announcing a new killer phone like the Motorola Z8 aka "Media Monster" back in CES 2007 but the world has to wait nearly 9-10 months for this to hit the Asian Market, by then, Nokia, Sony and Samsung have already introduced over 6-7 newer models in the asian market. Lastly, they are creating competition not with Nokia but within themselves. Before they can deliver the Motorola Z6, they announced the next model Motorola Z8. Would you buy the Z6 then?

      Report offensive
 
 
charlesfrith says...
I wrote about this over here last year.

charlesfrith.blogspot.com...

 
 
gabrielqchan says...
LOL read your little take on the RAZR, awesome perspective, and well-said - a has-been supermodel indeed! I guess it is true that mobile phones technology or rather consumer trends in the USA in this sector is not as advance as this part of the world, ASIA! Listen to what the Asian market wants, not need.

      Report offensive
 
 
Whitesaint says...
what can i say it is not about branding here ... since their technology aren't anywhere on par with its' sleekness and style...
there are always other mobile phones to satisfy the consumer.

 
 
OptimisticPessimist says...
I've never once been interested in Motorola phones, especially not the RAZR since I didn't like flip-phones.

 
 
ferdiei says...
the handset market is about DESIGN & FUNCTIONALITY. Moto phones are value for money (at least in SG with their local assembly here), and I would still buy them. but if they don't listen to what the Asian market is telling, this downward spiral will run through...

 
 
nimeshthakkar says...
Yes, after the success of MORO RAZR the company was not coming up with such good looking phones in the high range.

But now it has come up with few good phones like MOTO Q, MOTOROKR E6, E8, Z8, Z10.

But it still needs to improve a lot and come back to the same level as it was with RAZR.

Also the factor of publicity cannot be ignored.
The more you publicise, the more your product will sell.

 
 
drone1212 says...
I think what Motorola should do is to pay more attention to phone usability. I used the SLVR L7 once and there were just too many gaps in the ergonomics which made me give it up.

Motorola should look at how Nokia design their user interface and phone applications. Every minute details were catered for.

I went into a Motorola boutique in vivo city to take a look at the new models. I believe there were quite a few promising ideas but somehow something was lacking.

Firstly, being the company which brought about the 'slim' revolution, I am surprised that there is not enough breakthrough in that area for Motorola

Secondly, the feature sets in Motorola phones are mostly mediocre. If you look at it, it's not difficult to create a really desirable phone. A 9mm beauty with a solid built and a proper amount of chrome thrown in, complete with Wifi, HSDPA, GPS and based on Symbian.

You may say that it sounds like an E51 on diet but hey, I bought two E51 and three other person to whom I recommended it to has bought the phone within the last two weeks.

The other desirable phone I like is the Nokia Classic 6500, which is also slim, elegant and feature packed, although it lacks 3.5G.

The next hit phone I am waiting for is the W890 which is, surprise, surprise also slim and feature packed (HSDPA).

See the trend?

So, since Motorola started the anorexic phone craze, it should innovate in that direction. The formula is simple, make it:
- slim (9mm),
- elegant (Metallic design)
- feature packed...(eg, HSDPA, WIFI, 5MPx Camera and GPS)
- and oh...make sure your GUI works as well as Nokia and the phone features better than the iPhone :) and voila!.... you got a winner

and lose the gold plating, it looks really beng!!

 
 
Hocksman says...
I had the original Motorola brick. Then the first flip model. Now I use a smart phone (Treo 650). If Motorola wants me interested, make a smart phone.

 
 
To post comments, you need to become a member. It's FREE.
advertisement