NOD32 aspires to be an affordable, full-featured antivirus utility, and it
succeeds to a certain degree. However, an overly complicated interface, some
half-baked features, and its mixed results in our Labs' tests keep it from our
recommended list. Stick with
Norton AntiVirus 2002,
our Editors' Choice, or our underdog champion,
Norman Virus Control
5.0.
A Troika Of Desktop IconsWe'd
prefer to have an integrated interface in NOD32; it's confusing to search
through its many mini applications, not to mention the space they take up in the
system tray. When you install NOD32, it places three different icons in the
system tray: Amon, which performs on-the-fly virus checking of the files you
access; the NOD32 Control Center, which lets you schedule virus definition
updates via the Internet; and the
POP3
mail scanner, which checks incoming mail for viruses. As if that weren't enough,
there's also a separate NOD32 application, launched from the Start menu, that
scans the files on your hard drive for viruses.
The POP3 mail scanner checks incoming mail for viruses, but it doesn't block
infected messages from your in-box. It just notifies you that it found a virus;
you're left to delete the message on your own. The whole process gets annoying,
actually, since the separate Amon antivirus monitor will, in many cases, pop up
again when you select infected e-mail, but it still won't delete the virus.
NOD32's convoluted method may protect you in the long run, but we prefer the
Norton AntiVirus 2002 approach; Norton deletes viruses before they reach your
in-box. Also disappointing: you must initiate virus scans manually because the
software doesn't let you schedule scans.
Mixed Lab ResultsCosmetic issues
aside, NOD32 failed to detect several viruses and virus simulations in our lab
tests. For example, it couldn't even detect Kakworm-infected e-mail within a
mailbox file when we manually scanned the entire file. Most antivirus software
can at least detect a virus there, though most apps make you ferret out and
delete the message, as
McAfee VirusScan 6.0
does. NOD32 also failed to find simulated viruses in the
Rosenthal
test, which simulates viruslike activity in an attempt to check virus software's
heuristics, or the ability to use general characteristics to catch new,
unidentified viruses.
But NOD32's track record with the 200 or so circulating wild viruses tops the
charts. In our tests, we also check how well an antivirus program handles the
current viruses in the
WildList
as an indicator of a program's performance. And
Virus
Bulletin's 100% Award, handed out only to programs that spot every virus
making the rounds, shows that NOD32 performs as well as Norton AntiVirus.
To test NOD32's disinfecting power, we infected a system with the
Gibe
worm. The Amon real-time monitor immediately found the virus running in system
memory, deleted it, and removed Registry entries that would have launched the
virus at start-up. However, NOD32 left a few virus-created files in the Windows
directory and deleted them only after we ran a manual scan of the hard drive.
Limited Tech SupportNOD32 is
reasonably priced at US$39 for the first year for a single user and US$27.50 for
each year thereafter. NOD32 offers only e-mail support. The company's
Web
site offers information on the latest viruses as well as helpful FAQs and
additional documentation in PDF format.
Despite its low cost, a clumsy interface and a mixed score in our Labs' tests
sink this app. If you're looking for an antivirus underdog, look to
F-Secure Anti-Virus Personal
Edition, which caught all the viruses in our tests, or
Norman Virus Control
5.0, which sports a much more polished interface.