CNET Asia Review
Very good
The good: Wide, powerful lens with little distortion; quick performance. 7
out of 10View score
The bad: No manual exposure controls; tiny buttons; no stop-motion movie mode.
The bottom line: Though it leaves out one fun, little shooting mode, the Panasonic DMC-TZ3 improves upon its predecessor in nearly every way.
Read full review of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3 »
Average User Rating
from 8 users
Very good
7.1
out of 10User Reviews
Poor picture quality
Jun 30, 2009Rating: 2 out of 10 (Terrible)
Pros: 10X Zoom
Cons: Poor quality images in bring light, low light & with with flash.
Opinion:
I have major issues with this camera. The more I use it, the less I like it. Pictures taken on nice, sunny days often have vertical lines across the horizon and are unusable. Image quality in low light is also poor. When I use the flash the images are either far too bright or underexposed. I cannot recommend Panasonic Lumix cameras based on my experience with the TZ3. If I am the only one experiencing these problems, perhaps my camera is defective.
Great all round camera, not pocketable
Mar 7, 2008Rating: 8 out of 10 (Excellent)
Pros: optical zoom, wide angle lens, preconfigured settings
Cons: size
Opinion:
I used an excilim for years and was very happy with it, small enough to through in any pocket, very convenient.
Then I decided I wanted more optical zoom, I wanted to upgrade. I looked at so many manufacturers and models I got dizzy. I eventually settled on the TZ3.
Its a great all in one camera, not an ultra compact but not big like an SLR.
If you can compromise on a little on size, I highly recommend this camera.
Do NOT buy this camera (and this comes from a an-Lumix fan)
Aug 17, 2007Rating: 5 out of 10 (Average)
Pros: 10x zoom in relatively pocketable package
Cons: HUGE NOISE means over half of images turn out poor / unuseable
Opinion:
I have been a fan of Panasonic/Lumix cameras for a few years, from my FZ-5 later upgraded to an FZ-7. I loved the simple and logical menus, I loved the design, I loved the features, and I found the image quality to be quite competitive.
The TZ-3 I've just bought is however, a HUGE disappointment. I'd say it produces about two-thirds poor shots, and even the acceptable shots looks pretty poor when examined just a bit closely. No I'm not comparing to an SLR, I'm just comparing to decent compacts. But the TZ-3 is not one.
Please, please, Panasonic: could you take the same camera, and put in it a DECENT chip, and a decent image processing chain? I have now wasted about 500 USD. Why wasted? Because I'll probably go back to using my Canon IXUS - less zoom, but at least most of the images look crisp.
IN MORE DETAIL:
I've just bought a ... Read more
Rate It Now
Sponsored links
Welcome to a new era for Samsung Mobile
Discover overwhelming power and performance of the new Samsung JET now
Shopping for a LG HDTV?
Get tips on getting the right one here
CNET Asia is now on Facebook!
Be part of the most happening tech community in Asia on Facebook
CNET Asia TV
Watch gadget reviews, quick tips, movie trailers and more for FREE.
Business professionals average salaries
Contribute your profile and drive our salary charts - activeBizPros




