Mediocre

3.5

out of 10

Anonymous

 View profile

i don't know

Sep 30, 2005

Rating: 5 out of 10 (Average)
Pros: any?
Cons: well...
Opinion:
i really don't know!

A $200 paperweight

Jul 9, 2005

Rating: 2 out of 10 (Terrible)
Pros: 
Cons: 
Opinion:
At the beginning of 2003, I thought I was getting a decent camera for $200. This camera is, literally, garbage. The picture quality is poor and grainy for indoor pictures on any setting. Many times I would have to take 5 pictures and select the best one. The picture quality changes each time. There are only 3 or 4 very basic settings for picture lighting (flash, no flash, automatic, and red-eye). There is a delay when the snap button is pressed and when the picture is actually taken. It is also very poor on battery power. So after about 2,000 pictures, 3 color bars show up and the batteries must be removed since the camera freezes up. I've heard that this has happened with many of these cameras and I'm beginning to think it's a manufacturing defect. If it turns out to be a defect, I am going to be on HP's back to give me at least a partial ... Read more

blog camera canon inc. dslr facebook google inc. internet lcd mobile network nikon corp. olympus corp. panasonic philippines phone photograph sony corp. twitter video web