Olympus: E-P1's Pen design unintentionalThe recently announced Olympus E-P1 caused quite a stir in the imaging industry partially because it uses the new Micro Four Thirds technology, but primarily due to its retro aesthetics. In this age when most point-and-shoots are rectangular in shape and dSLRs look like black blocks with protrusions, it's no wonder that the radically different E-P1 raised more than a few eyebrows.
 Masaomi Tomizawa (left) and Yoshitomo Nagashima. (Credit: Leonard Goh/CNET Asia) Looking at the design of the E-P1, can Olympus share with us why the Micro Four Thirds shooter was modeled after the Pen cameras?  The Olympus E-P1 with the 17mm pancake lens and optical viewfinder. (Credit: Leonard Goh/CNET Asia) How long did it take for the team to design and develop the E-P1? When the mockup model was showcased at Photokina, we had only an idea of the specifications of the camera. We finalized its design only after the imaging tradeshow. What were the difficulties encountered when conceptualizing the E-P1? We first designed the outer shell of the E-P1, then the engineers had to modify the circuits to fill them into the space given. However, we knew that if the individual departments worked separately, everyone would have different ideas on the E-P1. To avoid any forms of compromise, we formed a team with key personnel from the design, research & development and production department and had them work toward the same goal. Why was a metal body design chosen for the E-P1 when it is targeted at the entry-level segment? The extra premium could be avoided if, say, polycarbonate was used instead. Yes, we agree that the E-P1 could be made more affordable if we used cheaper materials. However, we really wanted to make a high-quality camera, and to the company, the design of the shooter is the most important aspect. Hence, we still went ahead with using metal for the body of the E-P1. Is it possible to make future Micro Four Thirds any smaller, like the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3's present size? Yes, it is possible. But with regard to the E-P1, we felt the size was just right. But if consumers were to demand for an even smaller Micro Four Thirds camera, we would definitely explore that option.  The retractable 14-42mm Micro Four Thirds lens (Credit: Leonard Goh/CNET Asia) It is important to keep the whole camera system small, but we also have to consider how balanced the system feels when the lens is attached to the shooter's body. Also, different focal length optics require different engineering, so that has to be taken into consideration as well. What is the reason for not including an onboard flash, considering that this camera is targeted at the entry-level segment who may not be comfortable with operating an external flash? First and foremost, it is to keep the camera small in size. We could have included an onboard flash on the E-P1, but that would have made the camera bigger and we didn't want that. To counter the problem of shooting in low-light situations, we used a new imaging engine which can deliver high ISO sensitivity shots without sacrificing details. But if consumers really want to use a flash, we have the FL-14 external flashlight. Does Olympus approve of third-party manufacturers which make adapters to fit other lenses onto Micro Four Thirds cameras? We can't stop other companies from making peripherals that allow other lenses to be used on our cameras. It's a case of supply and demand. If there is a need for such accessories, then surely some companies will provide them. At the end of the day, it's the user's decision. We cannot comment on whether this is right or wrong. It's interesting that the E-P1 is able to record videos with Art Filters applied. However, certain settings cause the frame rate to drop dramatically. Why did Olympus still decide to go ahead with this implementation?  Art Filter application in video mode on the E-P1. (Credit: Leonard Goh/CNET Asia) How different is the TruePic V engine from the previous processor? The major improvement that TruePic V has over TruePic III+ is that the new processor can remove noise more effectively. This is important since we expect users to be shooting at high ISO sensitivities in low-light conditions. Also, TruePic V is able to render the color purple more faithfully, instead of showing it as blue which some image engines. We are very confident of TruePic V, and we think it can deliver better-looking pictures than some of our own dSLRs. So what's the level of collaboration between Olympus and Panasonic now? We worked with Panasonic to develop the Micro Four Thirds technology and the collaboration ends there. When it comes to developing cameras, it's our own affair and they don't know anything about it. Similarly, when they designed the G1 and GH1, we didn't have any involvement, either. Tags: DSLR, Imaging, Camera, focus group, video
|
- Talkback
-
There are currently no comments for this story.
To post comments, you need to become a member. It's FREE.
