Fujifilm FinePix S5700

The Fujifilm FinePix S5700 would be a nice budget megazoom if it weren't hampered by mediocre performance and a frustrating design.

The good Low-noise, higher-ISO photos; broad set of manual controls; optical zoom operates in movie mode; runs on AA batteries.
The bad Frustrating design; sluggish performance; no optical image stabilization.

CNET Editors' Rating

3.1 star

Average User Rating

4.15 star

Join the conversation

I Own it 0 I Want it 0 Not for me 0

  • CNET Editors' rating

    3.1 stars

  • Rating breakdown

    • Performance: 5
    • Image Quality: 7
    • Design: 6
    • Features: 7
With its attractive price, the Fujifilm FinePix S5700 seems quite a compelling buy for the budget-strapped megazoom shooter. And on some levels, it delivers the dSLR-like shooting experience that its design promises. Certainly, at 306g, its sturdy plastic body has the heft of a low-end dSLR.Design
However, it takes quite a bit of effort to adapt to the S5700's design, which ranges from simply odd in places--you increase shutter speed and aperture with the down arrow and decrease them via the up arrow--to downright frustrating in others. For example, every button requires a press and hold to register.

     

For more details on the S5700's design and image quality, click on the image.


We can't tell you how many times we accidentally ended up in macro mode or enabling the flash because we didn't press the exposure compensation button, wait, and check that it was ready for the down/up shutter speed input before making the adjustments. True, you can eventually pace yourself to match, but we don't want to lose 2 seconds waiting for the interface every time we need to make a change. I suggest trying the S5700 in a store before buying to make sure you've got the requisite patience.

It's a pity, because those lethargic buttons lead to a broad selection of controls unusual for this price class. These include three metering options (dubbed "Photometry" by Fujifilm); manual white balance and a handful of presets; continuous, single, or manual autofocus; sensitivity settings up to ISO 1,600; center focus, auto area select or user area select from 36 autofocus points; flash compensation; and exposure bracketing.

Features
Then there are the borderline gimmicky features. A High-Speed Shooting mode speeds focus by limiting the hunting zone to beyond 3.3 feet. Since that precludes focusing on anything closer, you have to know in advance that your subject will never approach you, diminishing its usefulness.
Related links
More 7-megapixel shooters here
Zany digicam accessories
Composing pics a different way
Read the digital photo newsletter



And you have to remember to turn it off, or (like me) you'll wonder why the camera can't focus on subsequent, closer shots. The S5700 also offers a 1.4-frames-per-second "Top 3" continuous-shooting mode--three shots only--but it's even less useful.

Furthermore, Fujifilm leads the pack at eking every bit of marketing possible out of high ISO shooting. Like many competitors, the S5700 offers a Picture Stabilization mode, which bumps up the sensor gain in order to increase shutter speeds. Fujifilm goes even further, with its Natural Light mode and combo Natural Light/Flash modes. In Natural Light, the S5700 bumps up the sensor gain to boost shutter speed--as far as I can tell, the only difference between it and Picture Stabilization is that you can't use flash in Natural Light mode.

The Natural Light/Flash hybrid mode takes two sequential shots--one with Flash and one at a high ISO/fast-shutter-speed setting--and lets you select your preferred photo at your leisure. Fujifilm uses its so-called "Intelligent" flash, however, which dials back the flash output and--you guessed it--combines it with a higher ISO setting.

In theory, Intelligent flash gives you the best of both worlds; a more natural color light plus higher shutter-speed sharpness. In practice, it delivers the worst of both--the flash makes the smeary high-ISO artifacts that much more visible.Performance
Though the lens is fairly slow--its maximum aperture is only F3.5 at the shortest focal length--the S5700 demonstrates reasonably good exposure latitude; I rarely encountered a situation in which I couldn't get a decent exposure at 1/80 second and ISO 64. As with many inexpensive cameras, however, highlights blow out on a regular basis.

Depending upon focal length, the lens can focus as close as 40mm to 0.6m in standard macro mode, and as close as 10mm to 1m in Super Macro (which locks the zoom at the widest angle view).

Typical continuous-shooting speed (frames per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Fujifilm FinePix S5700
0.5
Panasonic DMC-TZ3
2.5
Samsung Digimax L74 Wide
1.4


Shooting speed
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Typical shot-to-shot
Time to first shot
Shutter lag

Fujifilm FinePix S5700
3.3
1.3
0.6
Panasonic DMC-TZ3
1.3
2.3
0.6
Samsung Digimax L74 Wide
2.8
4.4
0.9
Image Quality
The irony is, the S5700's high ISO sensitivity shots don't look too bad, especially for a camera in its price range. But you can see some typical smeariness and a general lack of sharpness all around, which gets exacerbated as you increase sensitivity. So while you don't want to completely avoid settings of ISO 800 and below, you certainly don't want to use them as frequently as Fujifilm would have you.
Related links
More 7-megapixel shooters here
Zany digicam accessories
Composing pics a different way
Read the digital photo newsletter



By other criteria--predominantly white balance and exposure--the S5700 performs quite well. The lens has some distortion problems on the left side and a frequent problem with purple fringing on high-contrast edges, but these are also common in megazoom lenses. Movies look and sound OK, but are highly compressed with visible artifacts; though they're recorded using Motion JPEG, they're squashed down to about 880K/sec and use mono audio.

On the upside, the lens can zoom while recording. Both the EVF (electronic viewfinder) and LCD are fast and bright, but they only cover 97 percent of the scene.

Shooting speed is the big disappointment, mostly because of the slow focusing system. On one hand, it wakes up and snaps in a flash--1.3 seconds--and in good light there's only about 0.6 second lag between pressing the shutter and capture.

But when the light's not so good, capture lag jumps to an unacceptably high 2.2 seconds; typical shot-to-shot time is a seriously sluggish 3.3 seconds, which jumps to a snailish 4 seconds with flash. The S5700 constrains the number of burst frames to about 8, with an effective typical continuous shooting rate of 0.5fps and at best 0.7fps.

If you ignore most of the off-key bells and whistles and stick to basics like moderate ISO speed settings and semimanual exposure modes, the Fujifilm FinePix S5700 offers quite a bit for your money. If Fuji had only traded some of those high ISO gimmicks for better shooting speed and a more streamlined interface, this might have been a darn good camera.

As it is, you're better off spending just a tad more and buying one of last year's now-price-reduced models, such as the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7 or Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2.

Latest comments

0.05 stars

Pros: Great price, alot of fun.

Cons: Size is a little bulky, No Image stabalizer.

Summary: Amateur opinion (Bought 7 months ago)

Bought This is really my first real camera that I have fooled around with. At first took some excellent pics, and some bad ones. As I got use to different settings,less bad pics. Basically, for the price, it's a perfect learning camera for me. Also bought a Sony DSC-H3 the other day at a great price. Picture qaulity is better and Image Stab. but I have to say the Fuji is more fun.

Posted by MarkRod59
Reply

0.05 stars

Pros: image quality, colour reproduction, picture noise , vignetting, focusing

Cons: no image stablisation, no F2.8 aperture, no 28mm focal length,no face detection

Summary: despite cnet's low rating, and the absence of image stablisation, its a very good camera for the price

Although I would have like a camera with image stablisation, 28mm focal length and f.2.8 aperture, but cameras offering such features costed a lot more.So, I bought the S5700 because it offers macro of 1 cm for me to copy the thousands of old colour slides in my cupboard. Besides, however good a camera I buy now would be obsolete in 12 months time. I would just buy another one by then. After all, we live in a disposable age. So, instead of relying on CNET editor's rating of 6.2 (which is more or less the bottom of the class), I took a chance on the viewers' rating of 8, and my own judgement on past fuji cameras I had. Although at times, I regret not buying the camera with the features I like. So,I was pleasantly surprised to find that S5700 was rated top of the class of the 36 cameras tested in nov 2007 by the consumer association in Hong Kong and U.K (joint test of consumer organisations of several countries, test carried out in Germany).But, at the same time, I wasn't pleased with CNET's findings. I think CNET has the moral obligation to tell the truth of the technical test results of the cameras, or be less incompetent in carrying out the test. I mean,CNET are supposed to be professionals in reviewing the equipment to give guidance to consumers who do not have the resources or money to test all these equipment for a purchase decision. Perhaps the test results are purely personal opinions of the editors or testers. Unfortunately, CNET might offer the worst form of equipment testing, but the only one we have before the much much more reliable test from the consumer associations. Perhaps the consumer association should test equipment more often, so more people would buy their monthly publications.

Posted by mabel
Reply

0.05 stars

Pros: Almost all the function of a DSLR. 10x zoom. Video recording with sound & zoom in/out function

Cons: Power button position, can accidentally switch it on or off. Exposure speed max is 4 secs. 4 AA batt

Summary: value for $$$

This is really a valued for $$ digital camera. Image quality is not compromised even though this powerhouse cost less than $400.

Posted by fishing7
Reply

Join the conversation

Sign In with or create an account to post a review.


The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited.