Casio QV-R51

A stylishly designed and value-for-money ultracompact that's surprisingly feature-packed as well.

The good Small size; fast startup; utilizes AA-size batteries; easy to use.
The bad Reduced performance over the previous model; memory card not bundled normally.

CNET Editors' Rating

3.5 star

Average User Rating

0 star

Join the conversation

I Own it 0 I Want it 0 Not for me 0

  • CNET Editors' rating

    3.5 stars

  • Rating breakdown

    • Based on:
      Design, Features, Performance and Support:
      7.0

The QV-R51 is the latest entry into the list of 5-megapixel ultracompacts which are expected to flood the market this year. While nothing's been done in the looks department, this update of yesteryear's QV-R40 features a higher-resolution sensor, larger LCD display as well as power enhancements to help you shoot more with less.

What's New?
Like the rest of Casio's QV-R series of cameras, the QV-R51 doesn't excel in the looks department. Targeted at a different market from its popular ultraslim Exilim line, the QV-R has its priorities based more on functionality. As such, this really isn't Casio's answer to Sony's fashion-oriented DSC-T1. For that group of users, we should be expecting a 2004 refresh of the Exilim Z series soon, especially since Pentax has already announced one.

In the hands, the QV-R51 feels about the same as its predecessor, the QV-R40. However, we did find the zoom control a little flimsy when compared with the former. Otherwise, you should feel right at home if you've owned or used the older QV-R. While the software side of things hasn't made navigation easier, the 25 percent larger 2-inch LCD display should help in this regard. Disappointingly, the resolution of the screen hasn't improved and remains at about 85k pixels.

According to Casio, the manufacturer has also improved battery performance by a sizeable 36 percent over the QV-R40. The manufacturer claims the newer model is able to capture up to 900 images between charges. As you'll read further on, we did find the battery life to be good but due to time constraints we weren't able to verify the 900 figure.

Features
As we've come to expect from this series, the QV-R51 has a pretty extensive feature set although it's primarily a simple point-and-shoot model. More advanced photographers will appreciate the manual controls offered by the unit. These include three metering modes (multi, center-weighted, spot), manual focusing, exposure compensation, and white balance controls.

There are also other in-camera processing options such as the ability to control the levels of contrast, sharpness, saturation and multiple filter options to suit your taste buds. As with the later Exilims, there's also a real-time histogram to aid users in getting good, accurate exposures.

Like its other Casio brethrens, the QV-R51 comes with the extremely useful Best Shot mode. This assortment of pre-programmed settings caters to a wide range of photographic situations and first-timers will appreciate the pictures and descriptions associated with them.

When shooting stills the unit is able to save JPEGs at six resolutions and three compression settings. However, for the 5-megapixel sensor the 10MB (actual 9.7MB) of internal memory is grossly insufficient. Unfortunately, like previous Casio cameras, there is no external Secure Digital (SD) or MultiMediaCard (MMC) bundled with the unit even though there's a slot for flash memory. In the highest quality settings, we were able to capture only four photos.

Mixed Performance
In our tests, we found the QV-R51 to be a bit of a mixed bag. It clocked in slower than its forerunner for the shot-to-shot runs, but managed to retain the ultra-fast startup timing. This Casio still sprang to life in an instant (1 second) by either pressing the record or power button. Once awake, the fast zoom mechanism also made quick work of composition.

In our shot-to-shot runs, the unit performed dismally with the flash on or off. The camera required a horribly long 4 to 5 seconds between frames with the flash disabled and took seemingly forever to cycle with the flash on, averaging about 8 to 9 seconds. It would appear that although Casio has upgraded the image sensor's resolution, it has neglected to increase the buffer size--or at least the speed of it--resulting in a large dip in performance.

On the upside, the autofocusing (AF) system was decent, often taking about a second for situations with adequate lighting. Under dim or bad lighting, the AF took around 2 to 3 seconds. We should mention also that the AF has a slight tendency to get confused under low-ambient lighting and ends up obtaining the wrong focal points.

For battery performance, this little shooter showed strong stamina. Under normal usage, even after about 150 shots with the LCD on and in various flash settings, the bundled 2100mAH rechargeables on the QV-R51 showed no sign of giving out.

In terms of image quality, the Casio delivered mediocre photos. The final images compared well with Sony's own 5-megapixel point-and-shoot, the DSC-T1. We were also happy to notice that in its default settings, the QV-R51's images were not overly sharpened--an issue with the earlier Casios which resulted in visible artifacts when viewed closely. The colors captured were pleasing and the metering generally delivered well-exposed shots.

The Perfect Vacation Camera
Usually, using the terms affordable, stylish and feature-packed in a single sentence would result in a paradox. However, with a sticker price of just S$699 (US$413), this Casio proves to be an exception. At over S$300 (US$177) cheaper than Sony's DSC-T1, the QV-R51 offers a viable alternative for point-and-shoot users who need high-resolution pictures. The older QV-R40 became a great vacation cam because of its ability to take AA-size batteries. This latest iteration takes it further by improving the battery life, giving you the ability to shoot more between charges.

Latest comments

Summary: Not bad for a camera this size

I've just bought one of these and have been testing it to see how it measures up to the other digital cameras I have experience with (more expensive), and I'd sum it up as "Not Bad". That said, I may be returning this one as it shows three stuck pixels on its CCD which are bugging me. The images display quite a high degree of looking processed which I'm not used to. The stuck pixels show fringing for example--a clear sign of interpolation/processing. I'd rather the camera left that to me to control post-shooting! This camera is excellent in startup time and has the slightest discernable lag. Autofocus is fast and reasonably accurate, even coping fairly well in very low light. Build quality seems fairly robust and the large, bright LCD screen is usable for image composition even in sunlight--though colors and contrast become difficult to be sure of. As with many such compact cameras, the memory slot is annoyingly placed if you're using a tripod. Manual focusing is OK, but difficult to get accurate results. Chromatic aberation is noticeable, but only to be expected on such a small lens. Battery life seems very good, having taken hundreds of images before expiring. Many using the flash. Overall it delivers roughly what it claims--I just want one without the stuck pixels now!

Posted by Casio QV-R51 owner
Reply

Summary: Good value for money for a 5-megapixel cam!

My Fuji F401 died. Sent it for repairs five times and they they couldn't solve it. Bought this cam, enjoying every minute of it. Images are sharp and the cam allows you to get creative with the effects. It's awesome!

Posted by Benedict
Reply

Summary: Nice camera

Good camera with nice features. Good for value! Excellent.

Posted by chris
Reply

Summary: Bundled with problems

Exchanged the first Casio I bought on Monday. Exchanging the second one tomorrow. They both had problems with the internal memory. The second one had internal battery problems as well some type of short? I will give it one more chance and try the third tomorrow, then look for another brand. Example of a problem. I shot until the camera said memory full. I went to play back and it said camera empty! The photos were all lost on a reformat. Imagine if you were on a long trip and this happened. This camera has turned into a full-time job.

Posted by Anonymous
Reply

A stylishly designed and value-for-money ultracompact that's surprisingly feature-packed as well.

Posted by Anonymous
Reply

Join the conversation

Sign In with or create an account to post a review.


The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited.