Flashdance: Tango of the shuffle clones

It's odd, but the thumbdrive form factor got its biggest boost from an MP3 player that has been decried by some as a worthless piece of plastic junk. Still, despite the dire portent, there's no denying the fact that it went on to capture the headlines as well as the hearts of consumers everywhere (save Korea).

Though there are still manufacturers playing the form factor roulette, like iRiver's T10 and Sony's Walkman Bean, the singularly staid rectangular shape has been rapidly gaining a steadfast following. Certainly, it's becoming hip to be square as both the Samsung YP-U1 and Luxpro EZ Tangent can attest to.

Both MP3 players have adopted the same form factor and color of the Apple iPod shuffle, though with a few tweaks and adjustments, they've enough to hold their own. So who's the real superior souped-up thumbdrive MP3 player? The race starts here.

EZ Tangent
The shuffle
YP-U1
The Super Tangent
Meet the EZ Tangent Meet the YP-U1

Go to the bouts:
Round 1: Getting Physical  
Round 5: Just performance
Round 2: Unraveling the features
Round 6: How long do you play?
Round 3: Ease of use
Round 4: Compatibility issues
Bout 1: Getting physical

Winner:
The YP-U1


YP-U1 wins

We were not surprised to find that both the YP-U1 and EZ Tangent were only a gram apart in weight, with the latter proving to be lighter at 29g. That's barely discernible no matter how acute a user's sense of weight is (if there is such a sense at all). The Luxpro also proved to be the longer of the two, at 92.5mm compared with 87.8mm. However, it did steal back a point by being thinner than its adversary. For the statistician among you, that's 2.2mm.

The EZ Tangent retains the same joypad controls of the original Super Tangent, though there is a slight difference; visually, the new Tangent is oriented on a horizontal rather than vertical plane, probably to take advantage of the new OLED screen. We got good tactile feedback out of it and the size of the compass points were large enough to be comfortable.

Summing up Samsung
Samsung has declared itself the king of flash memory and it is easy to see why: It is so big that it's the main supplier for the iPod nano. Consequently, its ownership of this valuable resource has made the Korean company so confident of itself that it has declared the year 2007 as the day it will supersede Apple as king of the MP3 player market.

The YP-U1 also follows the same horizontal layout though its use of metal for the finishing of the joypad felt more expensive. However, Samsung erred in its execution by having too large a center button while the compass points were too small to pinpoint accurately while pocket rummaging.

Both MP3 players kept the audio port on the top, but for users with a larger 3.5mm headphone jack, the lanyard loop on the YP-U1 might hamper insertion.

Though aesthetic criticism largely boils down to personal taste, we were of the opinion that the YP-U1 held the edge over the Tangent. The smooth curves, color scheme (white/grey) and metallic detailing, including the gentle curve of the lanyard loop, helped in streamlining the unit's look. On the other hand, the EZ Tangent appeared clunky in comparison, with large white unused spaces. This may all be in the name of keeping things looking zen, but we thought it could be made a little smaller.

As thumbdrive MP3 players, Samsung again had the edge with a nifty flip-out USB jack that positively had us nodding sagely in approval. The EZ Tangent stuck out with the traditional removable cap design, very good if heritage is more your thing.

Samsung clearly has the lead here and when it comes down to the physical side of things, looks can be everything.



  Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6
EZ Tangent            
YP-U1 x          

 Back to intro 
Go to the bouts:
Round 1: Getting Physical  
Round 5: Just performance
Round 2: Unraveling the features
Round 6: How long do you play?
Round 3: Ease of use
Round 4: Compatibility issues
Bout 2: Unraveling the features


Winner:
The EZ Tangent


EZ Tangent wins

Against either one, the shuffle didn't have a prayer, not since both sport 128 x 64-pixel displays of their own. The Luxpro chose to go the OLED route which was certainly prettier to Samsung's backlit monochrome LCD. Both models topped up to 1GB for flash memory space which was still short of the industry-leading 4GB, set by the iPod nano.

In our recollection of Samsung MP3 players, there have been very few that neglect an FM tuner. This lack in the YP-U1 lost it a point to the radio-toting Tangent.

In sound tweaking, the Tangent possessed a very respectable 18 preset equalizers, though it failed to add the icing on the cake by omitting a user-defined one.

Leaping Luxpro
Taiwanese Luxpro has been making quite a name for itself. Its MP3 players are strangely reminiscent of Apple's entire suite of flash-based MP3 players, including the Pico (nano) and the Tangent series (shuffle). Yet Luxpro has made several incremental additions to its Tangent series; additional features which detractors believe the shuffle lacks.

The YP-U1 instead boasted a whopping nine-band user-defined equalizer which is good news for serial audio nitpickers, though it provided a paltry three presets and one bass booster. It's a topsy-turvy situation, and for scoring purposes, it's up to the user. Manual or auto?

Both models had voice recording as a standard, though the EZ Tangent included FM recording on the side.

The YP-U1 did have one trump card over the EZ Tangent--the Samsung Media Studio. It's a music management software and a big improvement over its previous incarnations. However, despite the software advantage, the YP-U1 still relied on tree-directory navigation as did its adversary, making it more of a perk rather than an essential.

There is a fair balance of features for both sides in this bout, but the omission of the FM radio is a nagging issue which ultimately hands the round to Luxpro.



  Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6
EZ Tangent   x        
YP-U1 x          

 Back to intro 
Go to the bouts:
Round 1: Getting Physical  
Round 5: Just performance
Round 2: Unraveling the features
Round 6: How long do you play?
Round 3: Ease of use
Round 4: Compatibility issues
Bout 3: Ease of use


Winner:
The YP-U1


YP-U1 wins

First, let's go back to our earlier point in design--tactile feedback and the design for the joypad were obviously superior on the EZ Tangent. An additional control such as Hold and Record located on a slider on the Tangent's back was marginally more convenient than the YP-U1 which placed the aforementioned on two different sides of the unit.

We would have to dock a point from the EZ Tangent for using the archaic losable cap. Even the Sony Bean has the USB jack hidden in a secret recess of the player, thus skipping the need for a USB cover.

The vertical menu interface for the Samsung was certainly cleaner and neater. There was also a sensible arrangement of relevant functions with contextual associations, supplemented by a neat font that proved very readable and unobtrusive.

The Luxpro, though using a colored screen, failed to take advantage of this native resource by squandering it on large tacky icons and fonts. We also noticed a glitch where after going two layers deep to activate a function--Settings'EQ'Rock, the unit would revert to the first layer (Settings) instead of remaining within the second layer (EQ) where we could make further adjustments.

Both MP3 player have definitely improved on the shuffle's usability factor by including a display. However, Samsung has turned out to be the one paying attention to the details.



  Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6
EZ Tangent   x        
YP-U1 x   x      

 Back to intro 
Go to the bouts:
Round 1: Getting Physical  
Round 5: Just performance
Round 2: Unraveling the features
Round 6: How long do you play?
Round 3: Ease of use
Round 4: Compatibility issues
Bout 4: Compatibility issues


Winner:
The EZ Tangent


EZ Tangent wins

Though it's a standard feature for Korean MP3 players, the included Ogg Vorbis audio format in the YP-U1 put it one up over the Taiwanese EZ Tangent which supports only MP3, WMA and WAV.

Luxpro, however, has taken pains to make sure that any computer would recognize its little player, with OS compatibility stretching from Windows to Mac and Linux. The YP-U1 apparently wants to be friends only with Windows.







  Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6
EZ Tangent   x   x    
YP-U1 x   x      

 Back to intro 
Go to the bouts:
Round 1: Getting Physical  
Round 5: Just performance
Round 2: Unraveling the features
Round 6: How long do you play?
Round 3: Ease of use
Round 4: Compatibility issues
Bout 5: Just performance


Winner:
The YP-U1


YP-U1 wins

Using 240MB worth of assorted MP3 files, we tested the contestants on their file transfer mettle. On straight drag-and-drop transfers, the YP-U1 did the deed at 1.64MB per second, while the EZ Tangent was speedier at 1.86MB per second. For comparison's sake, though the Luxpro did not come with a music management software, transfers with the Samsung Music Studio took 1.05MB per second.

Like our early examination of the EZ Tangent, there was a slight hiss that sat in the background of the left channel. Admittedly, it's very slight and detectable only when we used our Etymotic ER-4P MicroPro earphones. For most users, this should not be an issue. We felt the low end was not sufficiently punchy though the highs were crisp enough.

The YP-U1 performed adequately on the highs though we felt the mids came across as a little distant. However, tweaking the sound with the equalizer let us squeeze out a slightly brighter sound. Bass-wise, the unit was quite comfortable with Massive Attack's Angel, though we felt it was necessary to activate the bass booster for a more head-pounding low end.

The EZ Tangent edges out slightly against the YP-U1 in both transfer speed and sound, though it's still a close match for this bout.



  Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6
EZ Tangent   x   x    
YP-U1 x   x   x  

 Back to intro 
Go to the bouts:
Round 1: Getting Physical  
Round 5: Just performance
Round 2: Unraveling the features
Round 6: How long do you play?
Round 3: Ease of use
Round 4: Compatibility issues
Bout 6: How long do you play?


Winner:
The YP-U1


YP-U1 wins

Music is for forever and we most certainly would like our MP3 players to reflect that philosophy. Using 240MB of assorted MP3 files on a looping playback with volume set at 50 percent, the YP-U1 batted a very average 13 hours 53 minutes. The Luxpro fared even worse with a showing that barely made first base: 6 hours 15 minutes.

The answer was pretty obvious for this round, though the YP-U1 was not exactly spectacular, either.







  Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6
EZ Tangent   x   x    
YP-U1 x   x   x x

 Back to intro 
Go to the bouts:
Round 1: Getting Physical  
Round 5: Just performance
Round 2: Unraveling the features
Round 6: How long do you play?
Round 3: Ease of use
And the winner is... ?
Round 4: Compatibility issues
And the winner is… ?


Winner:
Samsung YP-U1



The Samsung holds off its Taiwanese rival this time and though it's the YP-U1 that has emerged victorious, both players are winners in their own right for having improved on the iPod shuffle form factor. Further competition can only breed better improvements after all.

Go to the bouts:
Round 1: Getting Physical  
Round 5: Just performance
Round 2: Unraveling the features
Round 6: How long do you play?
Round 3: Ease of use
And the winner is... ?
Round 4: Compatibility issues

Be the first to comment

Sign In with or create an account to post a review.

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited.