PS3 Slim makes dedicated Blu-ray players overpriced again?

Matthew Moskovciak | Aug 20, 2009

A US$300 PS3 makes us reevaluate the value of standalone Blu-ray players.
(Credit: CNET)

For most of Blu-ray's existence, the PlayStation 3 has easily been the best value in home theater. Only recently have we reviewed Blu-ray players that come close to matching its performance, speed, and functionality, while costing about the same amount.

The US$300 PS3 Slim changes the marketplace considerably. Standalone Blu-ray players that offer similar performance to the the PS3, like the LG BD390 and Samsung BD-P3600, used to offer some savings over PS3, but now they actually cost a little more. How can these standalone players expect us to pay more?

If you want to use the PS3 with a universal remote, you'll have to pay extra for an IR-to-Bluetooth converter. The standalone players have a few points in their favor. The most obvious is the ease-of-use, as they behave nearly identically to DVD players, making them easier for tech novices to use. The players also all have IR receptors, which make them easy to integrate with universal remotes without buying a pricey IR-to-Bluetooth converter.

Blu-ray players from Samsung and LG also feature Netflix and Pandora streaming, which are generally better options than Sony's pricey US movie store. More expensive players, like the LG BD390 and Samsung BD-P3600, also feature 7.1 analog outputs, making them better choices for those with older, non-HDMI A/V receivers who still want to experience Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio at their full resolution.

Even considering those factors, the PS3 Slim is an easy choice for anyone even slightly interested in high-def gaming or network media streaming. (Some Blu-ray players feature media streaming, but the PS3 offers a better overall experience.) We can still see the LG BD390 (currently our top-rated standalone player) being a better choice for some buyers, but we feel like the price is going to have to drop to stay competitive as the holidays get closer.

Standalone Blu-ray players may not be as overpriced as they were a year ago, but the PS3 Slim makes them seem like less of a value.

What do you think? Does the ease-of-use of standalone players, plus streaming features like Netflix, make them worthy competitors of the PS3 Slim? Or is the PS3 Slim now easily the value for the tech-savvy looking to get into Blu-ray?

Via CNET.com

Filed under: Games and Gear, Home AV
1 Comment | Bookmark | Share

Slashdot

Digg

Facebook

Twitter

Delicious

Google

StumbleUpon

close this

Add tag

To add tags, you need to become a member. It's FREE.

Cancel

Log in or sign in

LogicPTK

View profile

LogicPTK says...
As i have had a PS3 since Launch (many a year ago) i have never blinked at other alternatives. Albeit i do keep tabs on the Alternative solutions just in case there is something more to my fancy.

It's still king of the hill & to be honest i think it will be for at least a few more years.

Price aside it still offers full blu-ray/online blu-ray features/ true HD Audio, unlike the majority of alternatives.

If mine disappeared tomorrow would i get another/Slim if all i used was blu-ray's ???

YES!!
If just for the fact it knows where you were up to last time the disc was inserted, or even the 120x scan speed, or multiple choice of audio video output methods (control over the specific output resolution & all, as some other blu-ray players do also).

To me it is the life blood of HD Movies & i wouldnt have it any other way.

Games is another topic all together, though not my priority with this machine.

LogicPTK

Aug 27, 2009 00:20