
OK, before the angry fanboy comments roll in, let's get this out of the way:
the
PlayStation 3 is the best Blu-ray player on the market right now. It sits at the top of
our best Blu-ray players list, we consistently use it as the reference that we judge other Blu-ray
players against, and it's the only player on the market right now that supports
Blu-ray
Profile 2.0 and onboard decoding for both Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master
Audio. And it will always be the only Blu-ray player that streams media, has a
browser,
and plays PS3 games. Virtually everyone looking to buy a Blu-ray
player should go with the PS3 right now.
However, with that in mind, there are a few legitimate reasons why someone
wouldn't want to use a PlayStation 3 as his main Blu-ray player. Let's check
them out.
1. Doesn't work with universal remotes.Sony decided not to include
an IR receptor on the PlayStation 3, and home theater fans have been complaining
ever since. The lack of an IR receptor means that the PlayStation 3 won't work
with universal remote
controls, so you'll have to use the PS3 controller or the separate PS3
BD remote to control it. It's definitely a pain for anyone who is used to
activity-based macros such as "Watch TV" and "Watch Blu-ray" to control their
home theater.
2. It's louder than standalones.Although every PS3 seems to be
different, the PS3 can occasionally get loud once its fans start spinning. For
audiophiles, that can be a pretty big drawback, especially if you start to hear
a whirr during every quiet scene in a movie. You'll have better luck keeping the
PS3 quiet by keeping it in a well-ventilated area, but standalones are quieter
in general and don't mind having other gear stacked on them.
3. Interface isn't as easy to use.This isn't an issue for tech
enthusiasts, but Sony's Xross Media Bar (XMB) is packed with options and can be
intimidating for neophytes. Although we generally like the XMB for zipping
around the PS3's functions, using a standard Blu-ray player where you just need
to put in the disc and hit play is definitely a lot easier.
4. You have an older AV receiver and need multichannel analog
outputs.If you're using an older receiver and want to use its
multichannel analog inputs to get high-resolution soundtracks, you can't do it
with the PlayStation 3. You're better off going with a standalone Blu-ray player
with onboard Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio decoding, like the upcoming
Pioneer BDP-51FD and
Panasonic
DMP-BD50. Of course, if you're OK with standard DVD-style surround sound,
you can still get that with the PS3's optical SPDIF output, which is compatible
with nearly all modern receivers.
5. You want to be green.The PS3 is great at a lot of things, but
conserving power isn't one of them. If you're looking to stay green and limit
your power consumption, you'll be much better off using a standalone Blu-ray
player. For example, the PS3 sucks up about 170 watts while playing a Blu-ray
movie, while the
Samsung
BD-P1400 uses only about 25 watts. That's a fairly huge difference and can
easily wipe out any power savings from using other green products such as the
Philips Eco TV.
6. I need to see my receiver light up and say "Dolby TrueHD".Even
if you do have a new HDMI-capable receiver, you'll never get the Dolby TrueHD
light to turn on with the PS3. That's because although the PS3 can decode both
DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby TrueHD, it can't send those soundtracks in bit
stream format and allow the receiver to decode them. Of course, this isn't
really a legitimate reason, as you're still getting the same high-resolution
audio, but some people just need the comfort of seeing the Dolby TrueHD and
DTS-HD Master Audio lights on their receiver.
What do you think? Are any of these a legitimate reason to get a
standalone Blu-ray player instead of the PlayStation 3? Or is anyone who buys a
standalone Blu-ray player wasting their money on an inferior product?
Via
Crave CNET
To post comments, you need to become a member. It's FREE.
srikanthjanga
You forget to Mention Price, which is the single biggest reason why people are going to disregard your well made points on why they shouldn't use the PS3. The price of a standalone Blu-ray player is simply not worth the feature set. Also, load times are faster on the PS3. Also, you have one less device and power outlet to worry about when arranging your home theater. The upgradability of the PS3 is also a very big positive point for it. The added ability to play games when you want to is simply too big an advantage that no blu-ray stanalone can achieve. Last but not the least is the simply great appearance of a PS3 and its slot loading drive compared to the boxy players for those who are concerned with aesthetics. Now, I do not disagree with your points, but I just gave 6 reasons why you SHOULD get a PS3 instead of a standalone player. End of the day, the PS3 is the Prosumer choice for a blu-ray player while the standalones are only for those that dont mind spending the extra money for the little extra comfort or those who are too dumb to even know what they should get. I totally agree about the universal remote compatibility. just BLOWS !!!!
May 16, 2008 00:44