New Intel quad-core CPUs take the high-end, but the midrange is still up for grabs.
By Rich Brown
08/01/2008

Intel has dominated AMD at the high-end for a while now, and even after AMD squares away its higher-end Phenom issues, it's likely that Intel will hold its performance lead. That leaves AMD to rely on price drops to stay competitive. And while quad-core CPUs are still by no means mainstream, they're getting there, simply because of pricing. You've been able to buy a quad-core desktop for less than US$1,000 for almost six months.
Despite the pricing listed above, if you look online, you'll find a Phenom 9500 for around US$200 in real world pricing. We have to believe the desktop vendors are getting deals as well, which makes it easy for HP, and others to look to AMD to bring in quad-core PCs. If Intel's pricing doesn't get more competitive, consumers might come to think of AMD as the quad-core leader, simply because its chips are in the most affordable quad core systems, the ones that non-enthusiasts might actually buy. And it's not like Phenom is a bad CPU, it's just not as fast as Core 2 Quad. But if you can get a Phenom for significantly less, it starts to look more appealing.
Of course we like this kind of competition. It puts powerful technology into more hands because of lower prices. But it seemed like with the expansion of its Core 2 Quad 9000-series, Intel had a chance to really dominate the quad core market. But as long as AMD can avoid dropping prices too low (thus completely killing its profits), it could hold onto its bang-for-the-buck prize a bit longer.


